Xian JH-7 ‘Flounder’ Walkaround
The page features photographs of the JH-7As in service with the 82nd Regiment, 28th Division of the PLAAF at Jianqiao in the Nanjing Military Region.
The page features photographs of the JH-7As in service with the 82nd Regiment, 28th Division of the PLAAF at Jianqiao in the Nanjing Military Region.
| Serial/Code | c/no. | Prev. Identity | Delivered | Fate/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 081 | JH-7, 1st prototype, FF 14 Dec 1988 | |||
| 082 | JH-7, 2nd proto, w/o ? date | |||
| 083 | JH-7, 3rd proto, to CFTE, FBC-1 demonstrator in 1998 | |||
| 084 | JH-7, 4th proto | |||
| 085 | JH-7, 5th proto | |||
| 810 | JH-7A proto? | |||
| 811 | JH-7A 1st proto, FF 1 July 2002 | |||
| 8812 | JH-7A proto | |||
| 813 | JH-7A proto | |||
| 21092 | JH-7A, PLAAF 83rd Regt, 28th Air Div | |||
| 21094 | JH-7A, PLAAF 83rd Regt, 28th Air Div | |||
| 30591 | JH-7A, PLAAF 82nd Regt, 28th Air Div | |||
| 30593 | JH-7A, PLAAF 82nd Regt, 28th Air Div | |||
| 30594 | JH-7A, PLAAF 82nd Regt, 28th Air Div | |||
| 30597 | JH-7A, PLAAF 82nd Regt, 28th Air Div | |||
| 30599 | JH-7A, PLAAF 82nd Regt, 28th Air Div | |||
| 30690 | JH-7A, PLAAF 82nd Regt, 28th Air Div | |||
| 30695 | JH-7A, PLAAF 82nd Regt, 28th Air Div | |||
| 30698 | JH-7A, PLAAF 82nd Regt, 28th Air Div | |||
| 81662 | ||||
| 81669 | JH-7 | |||
| 81760 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81761 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81762 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81763 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81764 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81765 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81766 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81767 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81768 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81769 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81860 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81861 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81862 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81863 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81864 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81865 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81866 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81867 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 81868 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 16th Bomber Regt | |||
| 82064 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 17th Bomber Regt | |||
| 82065 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 17th Bomber Regt | |||
| 82067 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 17th Bomber Regt | |||
| 82068 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 17th Bomber Regt | |||
| 82069 | JH-7, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 17th Bomber Regt | |||
| 82160 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 17th Bomber Regt | |||
| 82161 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 17th Bomber Regt | |||
| 82164 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 17th Bomber Regt | |||
| 82167 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 17th Bomber Regt | |||
| 82169 | JH-7, PLANAF 2nd Sqn, 17th Bomber Regt | |||
| 83061 | ||||
| 83096 | JH-7A, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 27th Bomber Regt | |||
| 83097 | JH-7A, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 27th Bomber Regt | |||
| 83098 | JH-7A, PLANAF 1st Sqn, 27th Bomber Regt | |||
| 83191 | ||||
| 83192 | JH-7A, PLANAF | |||
| 83193 | ||||
| 86718 | ||||
|
Lockheed Aircraft Company
(Lockheed, Burbank, CA, USA.) |
|||
| Version | Quantity | Assembly Location | Time Period |
| XF-104 | 2 | Burbank, CA | 1953-1954 |
| YF-104A | 17 | Burbank, CA | Oct 1954-1956 |
| F-104A | 153 | Burbank, CA | 1956-Dec 1958 |
| F-104B | 26 | Burbank, CA | 1956-Nov 1958 |
| F-104C | 77 | Burbank, CA | 1958-June 1959 |
| F-104D | 21 | Burbank, CA | 1958-1959 |
| F-104DJ | 20 | Burbank, CA | 1962-1964 |
| CF-104D | 38 | Burbank, CA | 1961 |
| F-104F | 30 | Burbank, CA | 1959-1960 |
| F-104G | 139 | Burbank, CA | 1960-1962 |
| RF-104G | 40 | Burbank, CA | 1962-1963 |
| TF-104G | 220 | Burbank, CA | 1962-1966 |
| F-104J | 3 | Burbank, CA | 1961 |
| F-104N | 3 | Burbank, CA | 1963 |
| Total: | 741 | ||
|
Canadair
(Canadair Ltd, Cartierville, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) |
|||
| Version | Quantity | Assembly Location | Time Period |
| CF-104 | (1 F-104A conv) | Cartierville | 1961 |
| CF-104 | 200 | Cartierville | 1961-63 |
| F-104G | 140 | Cartierville | 1963-64 |
| Total: | 340 | ||
Aircraft delivered to Canada (CF-104) and Denmark (F-104G).
|
Fiat
(Societa Per Azioni Fiat, Turin, Italy) |
|||
| Version | Quantity | Assembly Location | Time Period |
| F-104G | 164 | Turin | June 1962-1966 |
| RF-104G | 35 | Turin | 1963-1966 |
| F-104S | (2 F-104G conv) | Turin | 1966 |
| F-104S | 245 | Turin | 1968-March 1979 |
| F-104S ASA | (147 conv) | Turin | 1986-1992 |
| F-104S ASA/M | (49 conv) | Turin | 1998-2000 |
| TF-104G ASA/M | (15 conv) | Turin | 1998-2000 |
| Total: | 444 | ||
Aircraft delivered to Italy, Netherlands, West Germany and Turkey.
|
Fokker Aircraft [ARGE Nord]
(Fokker, Schiphol, Amsterdam, Netherlands) |
|||
| Version | Quantity | Assembly Location | Time Period |
| F-104G | 231 | Schiphol | 1961-1966 |
| RF-104G | 119 | Schiphol | 1962-1966 |
| Total: | 350 | ||
Aircraft delivered to Netherlands and West Germany.
|
MBB
(MBB, Manching, Augsberg, West Germany) |
|||
| Version | Quantity | Assembly Location | Time Period |
| F-104G | 50 | Manching | 1970-1972 |
| Total: | 50 | ||
Aircraft delivered to West Germany only.
|
Messerchmitt [ARGE Sud]
(Messerschmitt AG, Manching, Augsberg, West Germany – later part of MBB) |
|||
| Version | Quantity | Assembly Location | Time Period |
| F-104G | 210 | Manching | 1960-1966 |
| Total: | 210 | ||
Aircraft delivered to West Germany only.
|
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
(MHI, Komaki, Nagoya, Japan) |
|||
| Version | Quantity | Assembly Location | Time Period |
| F-104J | 207* | Komaki | Apr 1962-Dec 1967 |
| Total: | 207 | ||
*29 assembled from Lockheed kits + 178 local. Aircraft delivered to Japan only.
|
SABCA [ARGE West]
(SABCA, Gosselies, Charleroi, Belgium) |
|||
| Version | Quantity | Assembly Location | Time Period |
| F-104G | 188 | Gosselies | 1961-mid 1965 |
| Total: | 188 | ||
Aircraft delivered to Belgium and West Germany.
Do 335V series prototypes
14 aircraft built at Friedrichshafen, mid 1943 to mid 1944, and tested at Mengen.
| Model | Code | Werk Nr. | Notes |
| Do 335V-1 | CP+UA | 230001 | First prototype. DB603A-1 engines. First flight 28 Oct 1943 |
| Do 335V-2 | CP+UB | 230002 | To Rechlin, rear engine caught fire, w/o 15 April 1944 |
| Do 335V-3 | CP+UC/T9+ZH | 230003 | A-4 prototype, to Ob.d.L. |
| Do 335V-4 | CP+UD | 230004 | Do 435 prototype, not completed |
| Do 335V-5 | CP+UE | 230005 | First with armament fitted, A-2 engines |
| Do 335V-6 | CP+UF | 230006 | Dornier development a/c, hit by bomb |
| Do 335V-7 | CP+UG | 230007 | Junkers Jumo 213A & E testbed, Dessau |
| Do 335V-8 | CP+UH | 230008 | Daimler-Benz DB603E-1 testbed, Stuttgart |
| Do 335V-9 | CP+UI/V9 | 230009 | A-0 prototype, to Rechlin May 1944 |
| Do 335V-10 | CP+UK | 230010 | A-6 prototype night fighter with SN-2 radar |
| Do 335V-11 | CP+UL/11 | 230011 | A-10 prototype trainer |
| Do 335V-12 | CP+UM | 230012 | A-12 prototype trainer |
| Do 335V-13 | RP+UA/13 | 230013 | B-1 prototype |
| Do 335V-14 | RP+UQ/14 | 230014 | B-2 prototype, to France, with CEV until 4 June 1948 |
Do 335A-0 pre-production batch
10 aircraft built at Oberpfaffenhofen July-Oct 1944. One example converted to A-4 standard.
| Model | Code | Werk Nr. | Notes |
| Do 335A-0 | VG+PG/101 | 240101 | DB603A-2 engines, at Rechlin July 1944, to USAAF as FE-1012 Dec 1945, scrapped |
| Do 335A-0 | VG+PH/102 | 240102 | Sole survivor, to US Navy as BuAer 121447 Dec 1945, now at NASM |
| Do 335A-0 | VG+PI/103 | 240103 | To Ob.d.L. late July 1944 |
| Do 335A-0 | VG+PJ/104 | 240104 | To Erkdo 335 Sept 1944 |
| Do 335A-0 | VG+PK/105 | 240105 | To Erkdo 335, captured by US at Lechfeld April 1945 |
| Do 335A-0 | VG+PL/106 | 240106 | To Erkdo 335 |
| Do 335A-0 | VG+PM/107 | 240107 | To Erkdo 335 |
| Do 335A-0 | VG+PN/108 | 240108 | To Erkdo 335 |
| Do 335A-0 | VG+PO/109 | 240109 | To Erkdo 335 |
| Do 335A-0 | VG+PP/110 | 240110 | To Erkdo 335 Oct 1944 |
Do 335A-1 production batch
11 aircraft built at Oberpfaffenhofen, plus 9 aircraft part assembled, Nov-April 1945.
| Model | Code | Werk Nr. | Notes |
| Do 335A-1 | 113 | 240113 | Captured by US |
| Do 335A-1 | 240161 | Captured by US. To RAE but w/o on delivery flight 13 Dec 1945 at Merville? | |
| Do 335A-1 | 240162 | Captured by US | |
| Do 335A-1 | 240163 | Captured by US | |
| Do 335A-1 | 240164 | Captured by US | |
| Do 335A-1 | 240165 | Captured by US | |
| Do 335A-1 | 240166 | Captured by US | |
| Do 335A-1 | 240167 | Captured by US | |
| Do 335A-1 | 240168 | Captured by US | |
| Do 335A-1 | 240169 | Captured by US | |
| Do 335A-1 | 240170 | Captured by US | |
| Do 335A-1 | 01 | 240301 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-1 | 02 | 240302 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-1 | 03 | 240303 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-1 | 04 | 240304 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-1 | 05 | 240305 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-1 | 06 | 240306 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-1 | 07 | 240307 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-1 | 08 | 240308 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-1 | 09 | 240309 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
Do 335A-2 Project only
Do 335A-3 Project only
Do 335A-4
10 aircraft scheduled Jan-Feb 1945, only 4 part assembled at Oberpfaffenhofen.
| Model | Code | Werk Nr. | Notes |
| Do 335A-4 | 10 | 240310 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-4 | 11 | 240311 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-4 | 12 | 240312 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
| Do 335A-4 | 13 | 240313 | Partly assembled. Captured by US |
Do 335A-6
None assembled, Heinkel Vienna-Swechat factory bombed out.
Do 335A-10
1 aircraft built at Oberpfaffenhofen, plus 1 aircraft part assembled.
| Model | Code | Werk Nr. | Notes |
| Do 335A-10 | 111 | 240111 | Flew late Nov 1944. Captured by US at Oberpf. |
| Do 335A-10 | 240114 | Not completed |
Do 335A-12
2 aircraft built at Oberpfaffenhofen, plus 2 aircraft part assembled.
| Model | Code | Werk Nr. | Notes |
| Do 335A-12 | 112 | 240112 | Air Min 223, to RAE 8 Sept 1945, w/o 18 Jan 1946 near Farnborough |
| Do 335A-12 | 121 | 240121 | Captured by US |
| Do 335A-12 | 122 | 240122 | Not completed, scrapped by US |
| Do 335A-12 | Partly assembled |
Do 335B series prototypes.
6 aircraft part assembled at Oberpfaffenhofen.
| Model | Code | Werk Nr. | Notes |
| Do 335B-2 | RP+UB 14/18 | 240118 | B-2 replacement proto |
| Do 335V-15 | RP+UC 15/19 | 240119 | B-1 2nd prototype, to Lwe Feb 1945 |
| Do 335V-16 | RP+UD 16/20 | 240120 | B-2 2nd prototype, night fighter with FuG 218 |
| Do 335V-17 | RP+UE 17/16 | 240116 | B-6 prototype, also W Nr 230017, to France CEV, w/o 1947? |
| Do 335V-18 | RP+UF 18/17 | 240117 | B-6 2nd prototype, night fighter, to Lwe Feb 1945 |
| Do 335V-19 | RP+UG 19/15 | 240115 | B-3 prototype, not completed |
| Do 335V-20 | B-7 prototype, not completed | ||
| Do 335V-21 | B-8 prototype, not completed | ||
| Do 335V-22 | B-8 2nd prototype, not completed |
This page gives brief information of each individual aircraft, together with a note on their final fate.
| MSN | Reg’n | Delivered | Last Flight | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | F-WTSS | - | 19 October 1972 | French prototype. Flew 2 March 1969. Preserved Musée de l’Air, Le Bourget, Paris |
| 002 | G-BSST | - | 4 March 1976 | UK prototype. Flew 9 April 1969. Preserved Fleet Air Arm Museum, Yeovilton |
| 101 | G-AXDN | - | 20 August 1975 | UK pre-production aircraft. Flew 17 December 1971. Preserved Imperial War Museum, Duxford |
| 102 | F-WTSA | - | 29 January 1976 | French pre-production aircraft. Flew 10 January 1973. Preserved Musée Delta (now Athis Aviation Museum), Orly Airport, Paris |
| 201 | F-WTSB | - | First French production aircraft. Flew 6 December 1973. Preserved outside Clement Ader building, Airbus France, Toulouse | |
| 202 | G-BBDG | - | First UK production aircraft. Flew 13 February 1974. Retired 24 December 1983. Stored Airbus UK, Filton. Due to move to Brooklands Museum, Weybridge | |
| 203 | F-BTSC | 5 January 1976 | 25 July 2000 | Air France. Destroyed in fatal crash on 25 July 2000 at Gonesse, near Paris |
| 204 | G-BOAC | 13 February 1976 | 31 October 2003 | British Airways. Preserved at Manchester Airport Aviation Viewing Park |
| 205 | F-BVFA | 19 December 1975 | 12 June 2003 | First Air France delivery. Preserved Smithsonian Museum’s ‘Steven F Udva Hazy Center’ at Dulles Airport, Washington DC |
| 206 | G-BOAA | 14 January 1976 | 12 August 2000 | First British Airways delivery. Stored Heathrow Airport. Due to move to Museum of Flight, East Fortune, Scotland |
| 207 | F-BVFB | 8 April 1976 | 24 June 2003 | Air France. Preserved Auto und Technik Museum, Sinsheim, Germany |
| 208 | G-BOAB | 30 September 1976 | 15 August 2000 | British Airways. Stored Heathrow Airport. Due to go on display at Heathrow Airport Terminal 5 |
| 209 | F-BVFC | 3 August 1976 | 27 June 2003 | Air France. Preserved outside Aero Constellation building, Airbus France, Toulouse |
| 210 | G-BOAD | 6 December 1976 | 10 November 2003 | British Airways, Singapore Airline colours 1977-80. Preserved Intrepid Air and Space Museum, New York |
| 211 | F-BVFD | 26 March 1977 | 27 May 1982 | Air France. Broken up in 1994 at Charles de Gaulle Airport, Paris |
| 212 | G-BOAE | 20 July 1977 | 17 November 2003 | British Airways. Preserved at Grantley Adams Airport, Barbados |
| 213 | F-BTSD | 19 September 1978 | 14 June 2003 | Air France. Preserved Musée de l’Air, Le Bourget, Paris |
| 214 | G-BOAG | 6 February 1980 | 5 November 2003 | British Airways. Preserved Museum of Flight, Seattle |
| 215 | F-BVFF | 22 October 1980 | 11 June 2000 | Air France. Preserved at Charles de Gaulle Airport, Paris |
| 216 | G-BOAF | 13 June 1980 | 26 November 2003 | British Airways. Preserved at Airbus UK, Filton, Bristol. |
Key Facts
| Main Role: | Advanced Trainer/Light Attack |
| Configuration: | Swept-winged jet |
| Country: | South Korea |
| Current Status: | In Development |
Development
Although increasingly well known for it’s ships, cars and consumer electronics goods, South Korea also possesses a thriving aerospace industry. An industry which cut its teeth on component manufacture and licenced production has now produced its second Korean-designed aircraft, the T-50 Golden Eagle. That this aircraft should be a supersonic combat aircraft demonstrates the breadth of South Korea’s capability and the extent of its ambition.
Korean Air Lines (KAL) was the first company in South Korea to be involved in aerospace, establishing facilities in 1979 to carry out depot level maintenance of USAF aircraft based in South Korea and the Pacific. Daewoo, Hyundai and Samsung established similar capabilities soon afterwards. In 1981, KAL was contracted to assemble the Northrop F-5E Tiger IIs ordered by the Republic of Korea Air Force (RoKAF). Korean industry subsequently won contracts to produce a wide range of components and sub-assemblies for Airbus, Boeing, Bombardier and Lockheed Martin – amongst others – and won praise for the high quality of workmanship evident in the delivered items. In 1988, development of South Korea’s first locally-designed aircraft, the Daewoo KT-1 Woong-Bee was initiated. This PC-9 look-alike turboprop trainer first flew in 1991 and entered service with the RoKAF in 2000. In the meantime, Samsung was awarded prime contractor status in the Korean Fighter Programme, under which 108 F-16s were licenced-built for the RoKAF. The contract specified extensive technology transfer to Korean industry, resulting in the last 72 aircraft being wholly built in South Korea.
In 1992, initial design studies were launched by South Korea’s Defence Development Agency and Samsung into the development of an indigenous jet trainer/light attack aircraft to replace the T-38, Hawk and F-5 in RoKAF service. The designation KTX-2 (Korean Trainer, Experimental 2) was assigned to the project. Substantial input into the design was made by General Dynamics (later taken over by Lockheed Martin) under the offset agreement negotiated for the F-16 contract.
In mid 1995 the basic external layout was agreed, but the project stalled at the end of the year as the gathering Asian Financial Crisis mean that available government funding could not now cover the remainder of the project – a foreign partner was essential to carry on. Several major aerospace companies showed interest, but none proved willing to invest their own money. Eventually, Lockheed Martin took the decision to upgrade its existing involvement from that of design consultant to full partner. On 3 July 1997, the South Korean government approved continuation of the project. Later in July, Lockheed Martin signed a formal agreement with Samsung under which it took responsibility for the Fly-By-Wire flight control system, avionics integration, wing design and supply of the APG-167 radar.
In October 1997, the contract to build and test six prototypes was received – including two static test airframes. Detailed design was now able to proceed rapidly and in August 1999 the external shape of the KTX-2 was frozen, allowing manufacturing drawings to start being released.
As part of the country’s economic reforms, Korean Aerospace Industries Ltd (KAI) was formed in October 1999 from the amalgamation of the aerospace divisions of Samsung, Daewoo and Hyundai. The other major South Korean aerospace manufacturer, Korean Air Lines remained outside of the main industry grouping.
In February 2000 it was announced that the KTX-2 had been renamed the T-50/A-50 Golden Eagle. The T-50 Golden Eagle designation being applied to an Advanced Jet Training variant, and A-50 Golden Eagle to an armed Light Attack/Fighter Lead In Trainer variant. Final assembly of the first T-50 prototype began on 15 January 2001, and it was formally rolled out on 31 October 2001. The maiden flight was achieved on 20 August 2002, with flight testing continuing until mid 2005.
The Golden Eagle bears a close resemblance to the F-16 – not really surprising when you consider its origins and the intended role of training RoKAF pilots to fly the F-16 – although it is actually about 80% the size of an F-16. Several design features are shared with its bigger brother, the most noticeable of which is the blended mid-set wing, complete with leading edge root extensions (LERX) and rear ‘shelf’ fairings ending in F-16-style split airbrakes. Sweepback is only applied to the wing leading edge, and missile launch rails are located at the wing tips. In a departure from F-16 influence, the engine air intakes are located at the fuselage sides, just below the wing LERX in a similar manner to those on the F/A-18.
The two crew sit in a tandem stepped cockpit equipped with two large Multi-Function Displays (MFDs), a modern wide-angle Head-Up Display (HUD) and full hands on throttle and stick (HOTAS) controls. The Lead In Fighter Trainer and Attack variants will be equipped with a Lockheed Martin APG-167 radar in the nose and a M61 20 mm cannon in the port wing root. The incorporation of many of the latest-technology but ‘off the shelf’ components and systems within the design is intended to deliver a capable but efficient, reliable and easy to maintain aircraft.
The Golden Eagle already has a production order for 50 T-50 trainers and 44 A-50 Fighter Lead In trainers from the RoKAF. Further domestic orders may follow, to allow replacement of the F-5 and F-4 in RoKAF service. The type also has obvious export potential – particularly among the ever growing number of F-16 operators. It’s manoeuvrability and advanced systems are designed to prepare future pilots to fly the next generation fighters such as the Eurofighter Typhoon, Dassault Rafale and Lockheed Martin F-35, while its combat capability allows dual-role adaptability. Potential rivals, such as the EADS Mako and Aermacchi M-346 have yet to secure any orders, while the class-leading but slow-selling BAE SYSTEMS Hawk may have reached the limit of its development potential. With the marketing clout of Lockheed Martin behind it, the future of the Golden Eagle is sure to be bright.
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Front view of T-50 001 with ‘Golden Eagle’ name still concealed |
Impression of the T-50 in rollout colours | |
| (All photos Lockheed Martin) | ||
Variants
Requirement Specification: ?
Manufacturers Designation: ?
| Development History: | |
| KTX-2 | Initial project designation. |
| T-50A | Initial designation for unarmed Advanced Jet Trainer version. |
| T-50B | Initial designation for Fighter Lead In Trainer version, with APG-67 radar and M61 internal gun. Later incorporated into A-50 version. |
| T-50 Golden Eagle | Official designation for unarmed Advanced Jet Trainer version. Also known as T-50 AJT. |
| A-50 Golden Eagle | Official RoKAF designation for armed version with APG-67 radar and M61 internal gun. Also known as T-50 LIFT. Fighter Lead In Trainer/Light Attack variant. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| This impression clearly shows the air intakes | This view shows T-50s resemblance to the F-16 | |
| (All photos Lockheed Martin) | ||
History
| Key Dates: | ||
| 1992 | Initial design studies for KTX-2 launched. | |
| July 1994 | Overall design layout finalised. | |
| mid 1995 | Preliminary design completed. | |
| July 1996 | Lockheed Martin chosen as foreign partner. | |
| 3 July 1997 | Production programme approved by South Korean government. | |
| 17 July 1997 | Lockheed Martin formally signs production agreement with Samsung. | |
| 24 October 1997 | Contract to build six prototypes received. | |
| 10 November 1997 | US Congress approves technology export licence. | |
| 12-16 July 1999 | Preliminary design review conducted. | |
| August 1999 | Overall design frozen. | |
| October 1999 | KAI formed from the aerospace divisions of three Korean companies. | |
| February 2000 | KTX-2 renamed T-50/A-50 Golden Eagle. | |
| 31 July – 4 August 2000 | Critical design review conducted. | |
| 15 January 2001 | Final assembly of first prototype begun. | |
| 31 October 2001 | Official roll out of first prototype** | |
| 20 August 2002 | Maiden flight of first T-50 prototype. | |
| 8 November 2002 | Maiden flight of second T-50 prototype. | |
| 19 February 2003 | T-50 prototype exceeds Mach 1 for the first time. | |
| 29 August 2003 | Maiden flight of first T-50 LIFT (A-50) prototype. | |
| 4 September 2003 | Maiden flight of second T-50 LIFT (A-50) prototype. | |
| late 2003 | Start of series production. | |
| mid 2005 | End of flight test programme. | |
| October 2005 | First production T-50 rolled out. | |
| 2010 | Last production A-50 for RoKAF delivered. | |
** Air International quotes 28 September 2001 as the rollout date, but this was only the anticipated rollout date in January 2001. Lockheed Martin press releases quote the October date.
Operators
Military Operators
| South Korea – Air Force | (94 T-50 & A-50 planned) |
| South Korea – T-50 Combined Test Force | (2 T-50 & 2 A-50 planned) |
| None |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| T-50 001 being rolled out | T-50 001 after the official naming ceremony | |
| (All photos Lockheed Martin) | ||
Specifications
| KAI T-50 Golden Eagle |
|---|
| Crew: Two |
| Dimensions: Length 42 ft 7 in (12.98 m); Height 15 ft 8.25 in (4.78 m); Wing Span 30 ft 1 in (9.17 m); Wing Area TBA sq ft (TBA sq m) |
| Engines: One General Electric F404-GE-402 turbofan rated at 11,925 lb st dry (53.07 kN) and 17,775 lb st (79.1 kN) with reheat |
| Weights: Empty Equipped 14,200 lb (6,441 kg); Maximum Take-off 26,400 lb (11,975 kg) |
| Armament: (A-50 only) 20-mm M61A1 Vulcan cannon in port LERX with 208 rounds, wingtip launch rails for AIM-9 Sidewinder or similar missiles, four underwing hardpoints and one under-fuselage centre-line pylon. |
| Performance: Maximum level speed ‘clean’ Mach 1.4; Maximum rate of climb at sea level 27,000 ft/min (8225 m/min); Service ceiling 48,000 ft (14,630 m); Range with full fuel 1,000 nm (1,150 mls, 1,850 km) |
Production
Design Centre
Head of Design Team: Not known
Design Office: KAI, Sachon, South Korea.
Manufacture
|
Korean Aerospace Industries
(KAI, Sachon, South Korea) |
|||
| Version | Quantity | Assembly Location | Time Period |
| T-50/A-50 prototypes | 6* | Sachon | 2001-2003 |
| T-50 | 50 | Sachon | late 2003-? |
| A-50 | 44 | Sachon | ?-2010 |
| Total: | 100 | ||
* two T-50, two A-50 and two static test airframes.
Subcontractors: Wings (Lockheed Martin), Aft Fuselage (Korean Air Lines).
Total Produced: 100 a/c (planned)
Production List
To be added.
![]() |
![]() |
|
| The first T-50 LIFT, with gun and radar fitted | The second T-50 LIFT wears grey camouflage | |
| (All photos Lockheed Martin) | ||
More Information
Books
None yet published.
Magazines
Air International February 2002
Flight International various issues
Links
Korean Aerospace Industries
(Official KAI website)
Shop
Flight Simulator Models:
To be added.
Scale Models:
To be added.
Scale Drawings:
To be added.
Videos:
To be added.
Click on aircraft type for more details
| Popular Name | Total Built | First Flight |
|---|---|---|
| RAF B.E.2a | 1 | ? |
| RAF B.E.2b | 500 | 1915 |
| RAF B.E.2c | 1652 | 1916 |
| RAF R.E.7 | 1 | ? |
| RAF R.E.8 | 1 | 1916 |
| Bristol F2B Fighter | 1 | 1916 |
| Hawker Hart | 9 | 1916 |
| Avro Lancaster | 1 | 1918 |
| Avro Lincoln | 2 | 1918 |
| Gloster Meteor | 2 | 1920 |
| Gloster Prone-Pilot Meteor | 1 | 1923 |
| Hawker Sea Hawk | ? | 1923 |
| Hawker Hunter | 3 | 1923 |
| Gloster Javelin | 7 | 1926 |
Click on aircraft type for more details
| Model Number | Popular Name | Total Built | First Flight |
|---|---|---|---|
| F.K.1 | 1 | ? | |
| F.K.3 | 500 | 1915 | |
| F.K.8 | 1652 | 1916 | |
| F.K.5 | 1 | ? | |
| F.K.6 | 1 | 1916 | |
| F.K.9 | 1 | 1916 | |
| F.K.10 | 9 | 1916 | |
| F.M.4 | Armadillo | 1 | 1918 |
| unknown | Ara | 2 | 1918 |
| unknown | Awana | 2 | 1920 |
| unknown | Wolf | 5 | 1923 |
| unknown | Siskin | ? | 1923 |
| unknown | Ape | 3 | 1923 |
| unknown | Argosy | 7 | 1926 |
| unknown | Atlas | 478 | 1925 |
| unknown | Ajax | 4 | 1926 |
| A.W.14 | Starling | 4+ | 1929 |
| A.W.XV | Atalanta | 8 | 1932 |
| A.W.XVI | 7 | 1930 | |
| A.W.17 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.17 | Ares | 1 | 1930 |
| A.W.18 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.19 | 1 | 1931 | |
| A.W.20 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.21 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.22 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.23 | 1 | 1935 | |
| A.W.27 | Ensign | 14 | 1938 |
| A.W.29 | 1 | 1936 | |
| A.W.35 | Scimitar | 5 | 1934 |
| A.W.38 | Whitley | 1814 | 1936 |
| A.W.41 | Albemarle | 602 | ? |
| A.W.52G | 1 | 1945 | |
| A.W.52 | 2 | 1947 | |
| A.W.55 | Apollo | 2 | 1949 |
| A.W.167 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.168 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.169 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.170 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.650 | Argosy | ? | 1959 |
| A.W.660 | Argosy C Mk.1 | ? | 1961 |
| A.W.680 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.681 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.682 | (project) | 0 | |
| A.W.690 | (project) | 0 |
| Official Name(s) | Sir W. G. Armstrong Whitworth & Co Ltd (1913-1918) | |
| Sir W. G. Armstrong Whitworth Aircraft Ltd (1920-1961) | ||
| Headquarters | To be added | |
| Country | United Kingdom | |
| Date Established | 18 October 1913 | |
| Current Status | Ceased | |
| Date Ceased | 24 May 1961 | |
Text text text text text text text text text Military, Civil, Dual Use
Status – Operational, Care & Maintenance, Abandoned, Returned to Fields, Built Over
Category – Public Airport, Air Base, Airfield, Landing Strip etc
History Google Maps link Last Updated Use – Military, Civil, Dual Use
Status – Operational, Care & Maintenance, Abandoned, Returned to Fields, Built Over
Category – Public Airport, Air Base, Airfield, Landing Strip etc
History Google Maps link Last Updated
Use – Military, Civil, Dual Use Status – Operational, Care & Maintenance, Abandoned,
Returned to Fields, Built Over Category – Public Airport, Air Base, Airfield, Landing Strip
etc History Google Maps link Last Updated Use – Military, Civil, Dual Use Status – Operational, Care & Maintenance,
Abandoned, Returned to Fields, Built Over Category – Public Airport, Air Base, Airfield, Landing Strip etc
History Google Maps link Last Updated
Use – Military, Civil, Dual Use
Status – Operational, Care & Maintenance, Abandoned, Returned to Fields, Built Over
Category – Public Airport, Air Base, Airfield, Landing Strip etc History Google Maps link
Last Updated Use – Military, Civil, Dual Use
Status – Operational, Care & Maintenance, Abandoned, Returned to Fields, Built Over
Category – Public Airport, Air Base, Airfield, Landing Strip etc
History Google Maps link Last Updated
| George Atkins (1915-1924) |
| Elliot Blackstone (1924-1944) |
| T. R. Hawthorne (1944-1961) |
To be added.
Armstrong Whitworth Aircraft Since 1913 by Oliver Tapper (Putnam, 1988)
World Encyclopedia of Aircraft Manufacturers by Bill Gunston (Sutton Publishing, 2005)
British Aircraft Manufacturers Since 1908 by Gunter Endres (Ian Allan, 1995)
British Built Aircraft, Volume 4: Central & Eastern England by Ron Smith (Sutton Publishing, 2004)
Air Enthusiast No.43 & 44
No one who saw the First Gulf War in 1991 was glued to the television set looking at the majestic sight of the United States Army’s newest Theater Anti-Missile System, the now famous MIM-104 Patriot. Night after night, the vaunted weapon was launched in an attempt to intercept Iraq’s unsophisticated and terrible inaccurate Scud mid range missile. The image of America’s missile intercepting an incoming object captured the attention of almost anyone. As new and sensational as the Patriot looked in that conflict, the system was actually in its third decade of life.
Born during the height of the Cold War (1963) in an attempt by the US to overlap their complex HAWK air defense platform, the Army decided to develop the Air Defense System (AADS). More than thirty summers has passed since the first blue print for the MIM-104 was submitted for initial review. Baptized under fire in the gulf and in many other theaters, the Patriot has become America’s top defensive weapon. Multiples upgrades were performed since that summer. Changes that had improved dramatically the capability of the system.
One of the most significant modifications came in the spring of 2005 when the Patriot was fitted with the most advance targeting array in the world, the now famous MPQ-53V. The 53V is a phased array radar and associated processor that control the missile’s trajectory from its launch. The radar is a multifunctional, electronically scanned array mounted on the M-860 trailer which is towed by an M Engagement Control Center. For target identification, the 53V used the powerful Hazeltine (TPX-46-7) Target Identification Friend or Foe (IFF). A self-contain data link is use to communicate with the rest of the missile package.
The Patriot was designed to operate in all weather conditions without losing operational effectiveness. It can destroy aircraft and missiles at all altitudes. It can direct several missiles to engage multiple targets simultaneously even in the toughest electronic jamming environment. For this, the MPQ utilized a top tier lens array which operated an free optical feed. Sum and difference patterns are individually optimized with a monopulse feed optimizing its efficiency. The aperture is round and utilized around 5000 ferrite phase shifter. A four bit, flux driven, non-reciprocal ferrite phase shifter and waveguide radiators are located at both temperatures. A separate, redundant array for missile guidance and IFF is also part of the overall platform’ profile.
The most recognizable feature of radar is its face. A huge, phased array face dominates the upper part of the antenna unit. The ‘face’ performs as both, surveillance and tracking mechanism. Below the face lays an almost circular, 5000 element phase shifter which has two smaller units (each with 50 elements a piece). A row of 18 rectangular boxes divided the antenna almost in half, with access boxes. Two slight larger planar arrays are for the command-guidance and it’s receiving its links directly for the missile.
Before an engagement is achieved, the radar array has to be aligned to cover the much of expected direction of attack. During the engagement, the radio beam is steered electronically in azimuth and elevation. The system was designed in such a mater than it can prioritize a single target from several locations.
The radar utilized a Track-via-Missile (TVM) System in order to suppress its overall cost. In semi-active systems, the radar illuminates the target and a seeker in the missile’s head tracks the reflecting energy. Then the missile computes the interception pattern based on its bearing to the engaging object. The TVM allows the missile to relay the same bearing data to the engagement control station via the radar. The platform’s powerful processors comb through the information with the absolute position of the target, the missile and the profile (velocity, altitude, bearings) of the engaging object and generate tracking commands to guide the warhead to the optimums interception point. In the terminal phase, the missile’s acquisition system acquires the target and relays the data to the phase array where the final intercepting calculations are performed.
The main advantage the TVM system has over its competitors is that the powerful ground based processors are use mostly for guidance thus allowing more data interpretation time. This processing technique make it’s difficult for countermeasures to jam the Patriot’s targeting trajectory. Even when the Patriot’s targeting radar is receiving jamming strobe, its missile can still maintain missile-to-target bearing data from the TVM system. On top of this, the ground based processors have sufficient computing power to resolve troubling jamming issues such as blinking jamming, where two aircrafts in formation jam alternatively to frustrate home-on-jam modes.
Raytheon, the Patriot’s primary contractor (its have all the Defense Department contracts for the system that surpassed the $ 5 million mark) had produced a reported 128 MPQ-53V units for the US Army and an estimated 26 for Japan’s Self Defense Force (2007 totals). Price for each unit is around $ 2.5 million.
Technical Data
Weight 79,008lb
Length 56.08ft
Height 11.83ft
Width 29.42ft
Frequency 4-6 GHz
Range 68km
Detection Sector 120deg
Engagement Sector 90deg
Target Capacity 50 simulations
Missile Control Capacity 9 in final engagement